Home > News > Headlines

printer friendly version
Close Senate vote supports development in ANWR
Thursday, March 17, 2005

Republicans claimed victory on Wednesday after the Senate narrowly rejected a Democrat effort to block drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Several members of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee played key roles in the debate and vote on the controversial issue. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) introduced the amendment to strip authorization for drilling from the federal government's budget while Republicans on the committee, including Sens. Pete Domenici (R-New Mexico) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), argued against it.

The amendment polarized the two parties but in the end, Republicans were able to obtain the 51 votes, just one more than necessary, needed to defeat it. They did so with the votes of two Indian committee Democrats -- Sens. Daniel Inouye and Daniel Akaka, both of Hawaii.

While drilling is not a done deal, Republicans nevertheless praised the vote as a showing of their party's force. "The Senate today affirmed its deep concern for our consumers and our economy," said Domenici, who also serves as chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. "We signaled our concern over dropping fuel inventories, record high energy prices and global uncertainty."

Besides economic concerns, debate on the measure turned to the impact drilling might have on Alaska Natives, who are on both sides of the issue. Inupiat Eskimos, who own land and resource rights in the refuge where drilling is proposed, support development because it would create jobs and generate revenue.

On the other hand, members of the Gwich'in Nation, who live in a village right outside the southern border of ANWR, oppose drilling for fear it will harm the Porcupine caribou herd. The tribe relies on the herd for food and cultural survival.

Inouye, former chairman of the Indian committee, discounted the Gwich'in Nation by arguing that the majority of Alaska Natives support development. "There are 230 Indian tribes and tribal villages in the state of Alaska," he said. "One tribe is against it."

Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) does not sit on the Indian committee but also brought up Alaska Natives. He said approval of drilling will help all Natives, not just the Eskimos, because revenues will be distributed among the Native regional corporations, which are not tribes or governments.

"When one region gets money from natural resources, it must share will the other 11 regions," he said. "That's why all Alaska Natives have an interest in ANWR."

The Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, a corporation of 8,000 Inupiat Eskimos, owns drilling rights to some of the land in ANWR where drilling might occur. The surface rights are held by the Kaktovik Inupiat Corporation, a corporation representing the Inupiat village of Kaktovik.

ASRC officials insist drilling can be done in an environmentally sound way. Development has occurred on Native-owned land outside the refuge without detrimental impacts, they say.

The Gwich'in, who are Athabaskan, believe any disturbance within will harm the caribou herd, which migrates from Canada into Alaska. ANWR is the calving ground for caribou mothers.

The pro-drilling provision is contained in the budget resolution, which still needs to pass the Senate. It must be reconciled with the House's version of the bill, which doesn't include drilling.

After the vote yesterday, Rep. Richard Pombo (R-California), chairman of the House Resources Committee, said he will include authorization for drilling in the national energy policy legislation. "Oil is the lifeblood of our economy and a critical component of our national security, which is why it only takes common sense to conclude that we should produce more of it here at home," he said. "America needs American oil."

Roll Call:
To strike section 201(a)(4) relative to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (March 16, 2003)

Relevant Links:
Gwich'in Steering Committee - http://www.alaska.net/~gwichin
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. Fish and Willdife Service - http://arctic.fws.gov
The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Pro-Development site - http://www.anwr.org

Related Stories:
Senate vote on ANWR drilling said to be very close (3/16)
Letters: Gale Norton still wrong on ANWR drilling (3/16)
Editorial: Norton wrong about drilling in ANWR (3/15)
Gale Norton: Drilling in ANWR won't hurt environment (3/14)
Stevens 'depressed' over ANWR drilling fight (3/14)
House, Senate differ on ANWR energy legislation (3/10)
GOP to include ANWR drilling in budget measure (3/9)
Arctic drilling a sensitive issue for Inupiat Eskimos (3/7)
Senate Republicans optimistic on ANWR drilling (12/16)
GOP says it has votes to authorize ANWR drilling (11/05)
Bush administration prepares for second term (11/04)
Bruce Babbitt: Arctic drilling would harm Inupiats (07/08)
House Republican drop bid to open ANWR to drilling (06/17)
House Republicans push two energy bills through (6/16)
Alaska to open ANWR shores to oil and gas drilling (04/01)
Alaska Native mayor decries spread of development (02/13)
Norton approves development in Alaska reserve (01/23)
Norton wants to drill more than ANWR (11/04)
ANWR opponent named AFN's top citizen (10/28)
House negotiators approve ANWR proposal (10/03)
Republicans revive ANWR drilling (9/27)
Bush wants ANWR and that's that (9/26)
Bush veto over ANWR drilling not certain (9/24)
Norton: Veto bill if no ANWR drilling (9/20)
House-Senate hammer out energy bill (6/28)
ANWR advocates on energy bill committee (6/14)
DOI official says public doesn't get it (5/10)
Energy picks have Murkowski happy (5/3)
Democrats balk on energy negotiations (5/2)
Senate approves energy bill (4/26)
Work wraps up on energy bill (4/25)
Alaska Native drilling won't be pushed (4/24)
Murkowski silent on Native drilling (4/22)
Senate rejects ANWR drilling proposal (4/19)
Next Stop: Drilling on Inupiat land (4/19)
On drilling, a defeat for Bush (4/19)
Bush looks for other places to drill (4/19)
Votes for ANWR said lacking (4/18)
ANWR proposals offered(4/17)
Editorial: Norton's ANWR video (4/17)
ANWR swing votes sought (4/16)
Norton defends use of pro-ANWR video (4/12)
ANWR amendment delayed in Senate (4/12)
Hussein threat sparks ANWR plea (4/11)
Burns says caribou impact 'nil' (4/10)
Native drilling to impact caribou (4/9)
New ANWR analysis questioned (4/5)
Bush discounting drilling report (4/1)
Drilling report was held back (4/1)
Gwich'in activist still at it (3/25)
Pros and Cons: Arctic Drilling (3/19)
Among Inupiat Eskimos, an 'injustice' (3/13)
Senate takes up energy bill (3/6)
Campbell: Drill ANWR (3/4)
For or against, Inupiats tied to off-shore drilling (11/2)
Inupiats press for oil drilling in ANWR (10/26)
ASRC supporting anti-drilling complaint (10/26)
'Attack' on Gwich'in decried (10/24)
Norton admits ANWR 'mistake' (10/23)
Norton staff rewrote Arctic drilling data (10/19)
Arctic drilling debate continues (10/15)
Bush promotes ANWR as home security (10/12)
ANWR spared in defense vote (10/3)
House approves limited Arctic drilling (8/2)
Bush makes last-ditch pitch for Arctic drilling (8/1)
House panel approves Arctic drilling (7/18)
Gwich'in Nation blind-sided by Norton visit (6/15)
Norton: Indian Country won't get ripped off (5/24)
Alaska Natives square off over Arctic drilling (5/18)
Campbell: Alaska Natives support drilling (4/25)
Gwich'in Nation: We Come from the Caribou (4/4)
GOP Senators unveil drilling proposal (2/27)

Copyright © 2000-2005 Indianz.Com