indianz.com Dynamic Homes
Advertise on Indianz.Com
Home Whats New on Indianz.Com? News Forums
  About
Home > News > Headlines

printer friendly version
Transcript: President Bush and Jack Abramoff
Friday, January 27, 2006

The following is the text of several Jack Abramoff questions President Bush was asked during a White House press conference on January 26, 2006. The entire transcript can be found at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/01/20060126.html.

Q What do you hear or your staff hear about releasing of photographs of Jack Abramoff with you, Mr. President? If you say you don't fear anything, tell us why you won't release them?

THE PRESIDENT: She's asking about a person who admitted to wrongdoing and who needs to be prosecuted for that. There is a serious investigation going on, as there should be. The American people have got to have confidence in the -- in the ethics of all branches of government. You're asking about pictures -- I had my picture taken with him, evidently. I've had my picture taken with a lot of people. Having my picture taken with someone doesn't mean that I'm a friend with them or know them very well. I've had my picture taken with you -- (laughter) -- at holiday parties.

My point is, I mean, there's thousands of people that come through and get their pictures taken. I'm also mindful that we live in a world in which those pictures will be used for pure political purposes, and they're not relevant to the investigation.

Q Do you know how many?

THE PRESIDENT: I don't have any idea.

. . .

Q Mr. President, you talked about Jack Abramoff in the context of pictures, but it may not necessarily just be about pictures. He also had some meetings with some of your staff. So you remember, you ran on the idea of restoring honesty and integrity to the White House. So why are you letting your critics perhaps attack you and paint you with maybe a guilt by association? Why not just throw open your books and say, look, here is --

THE PRESIDENT: There is a serious investigation going on by federal prosecutors, and that's their job. And they will -- if they believe something was done inappropriately in the White House, they'll come and look, and they're welcome to do so. There's a serious investigation that's going on.

Q But, sir, don't you want to tell the American people look, as I promised, this White House isn't for sale and I'm not for sale?

THE PRESIDENT: It's hard for me to say I didn't have pictures with the guy when I did. But I have also had pictures with thousands and thousands of people. I mean, people -- it's part of the job of the President to shake hands and -- with people and smile. (Laughter.) And I do. And the man contributed to my campaigns, but he contributed, either directly or through his clients, to a lot of people in Washington. And this needs to be cleared up so the people have confidence in the system.

. . .

Q Can I ask you again, why won't you release the photos of yourself with Jack Abramoff? THE PRESIDENT: I just answered the question.

Q Can you say, sir, whether you were lobbied by Jack Abramoff or other lobbyists, and what your policy is about lobbyists meeting with senior staff?

THE PRESIDENT: You know, I, frankly, don't even remember having my picture taken with the guy. I don't know him. And this investigation will -- needs to look into all aspects of his influence on Capitol Hill, and if there's some in the White House, I'm sure they're going to come and knock on the door. But I -- I can't say I didn't ever meet him, but I meet a lot of people. And evidently, he was just like you were the other day, at a holiday party -- came in, put -- the grip-and-grin, they click the picture and off he goes. And that's just -- I take thousands of -- I mean, somebody told me I maybe take over 9,000 pictures this holiday season. And he obviously went to fundraisers, but I've never sat down with him and had a discussion with the guy.

Q Do you meet with lobbyists?

THE PRESIDENT: I try not to. Have I ever met with one? Never having met with one is a -- if I ever say that, sure enough, you'll go find somebody. But, no, I don't have them come in.

Now, when, for example, people are helping on issues -- like on promoting trade -- you bet, we bring them in and I say, thank you for promoting CAFTA; or, thanks for working on the vote; or, thanks for helping on tax relief. That may be -- if you consider that a meeting, the answer is, yes, I'm sure I have, in a roomful of people as we either thank people for success in policy or thank people for going out of their way to get a piece of legislation passed on the Hill.

Copyright © 2000-2006 Indianz.Com
More headlines...
Local Links:
In The Hoop | Indian Gaming | The Federal Register
Casino Stalker | Federal Recognition Database
Jobs and Notices:
Indian Law Resource Center Development Director
American Indian Alaska Native Tourism Association Financial Manager
Employment Opportunity Membership Coordinator
Native American Contractors Association Executive Director
Contact Blue Earth Marketing, lchen@blueearthmarketing.com, to place your ad here!
Latest News:
Native Sun News: Study shows high Indian infant death rate (2/9)
9th Circuit rejects bid to protect sacred San Francisco Peaks (2/9)
Oglala Sioux Tribe files lawsuit targeting liquor in Whiteclay (2/9)
Washington court backs Yakama Nation man in fishing case (2/9)
Witness list for SCIA hearing on Internet gaming and tribes (2/9)
Doug George-Kanentiio: Solving Canada's Indian 'problem' (2/9)
Billy Frank: Let's win salmon recovery battle in Washington (2/9)
Kim Teehee: Celebrate the anniversary of Lets Move! effort (2/9)
Charlie Galbraith: Land consolidation plan is a step forward (2/9)
Steven Newcomb: Allotment a massive grab of Indian lands (2/9)
Opinion: San Manuel Band chairman linked to violent crimes (2/9)
Hualapai Tribe votes for takeover of Grand Canyon Skywalk (2/9)
OPB: Growing enrollment a big issue for tribes in Northwest (2/9)
Gila River Indian Community rejects highway on reservation (2/9)
Freedmen, ousted from Muscogee Nation, seek recognition (2/9)
Tribes meet with Oklahoma governor to discuss water case (2/9)
Campaign eyes $80M to finish Indian museum in Oklahoma (2/9)
KCAW: Tlingit 'dictionary' baffling speakers of the language (2/9)
Eastern Pequot Tribal Nation disputes suit over recognition (2/9)
Hundreds in Indian town struck by food poisoning after rally (2/9)
Oklahoma attorney general files suit to stop Kialegee casino (2/9)
Editorial: Lawsuit can help resolve fight over Kialegee casino (2/9)
Chickasaw Nation breaks ground on 18th casino in Oklahoma (2/9)
Gun Lake Tribe celebrates first anniversary of gaming facility (2/9)
UKB hopes to convince South Carolina governor on casino bid (2/9)
Opinion: Lobbyists always win when it comes to tribal gaming (2/9)
Native Sun News: Oglala Sioux Tribe to host Keystone XL rally (2/8)
Rick Santorum boosts campaign with victories in three states (2/8)
Rep. Markey calls for hearing on Alaska Native corporations (2/7)
Larry Echo Hawk: How being a Mormon helped me succeed (2/7)
Steve Russell: Talking Mitt Romney with cousin Ray Sixkiller (2/7)
Jeromy Sullivan: Protect Port Gamble from overdevelopment (2/7)
Julia Good Fox: A unified political platform for Indian Country (2/7)
DC Circuit set to hear first of challenges to Cobell settlement (2/7)
more headlines...

Home | Abramoff | Arts & Entertainment | Business | Canada | Cobell | Education | Environment | Forum | Health | Humor | Indian Gaming | Jobs | Law | National | News | Opinion | Politics | Recognition | Sports | Trust

Suggest a Site

Indianz.Com Terms of Service | Indianz.Com Privacy Policy
About Indianz.Com | Contribute to Indianz.Com | Advertise on Indianz.Com | Write to Indianz.Com

Indianz.Com is a product of Noble Savage Media, LLC and Ho-Chunk, Inc.