New York governor approves off-reservation casino
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Filed Under:
National
New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer (D) approved an off-reservation casino on Monday,
marking only the fourth time in the history of Indian gaming that a state has
allowed such development.
Since the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act was passed in 1998,
at least a dozen tribes have sought state approval to
open a casino on land far from an existing reservation.
But nearly every single proposal has been killed at the state level,
with the most recent denials coming from Louisiana and Wisconsin.
The St. Regis Mohawk Tribe beat the odds with its plan to
build a $600 million casino in the Catskills, an economically-depressed
region about 90 minutes north of New York City.
Although the site is nearly 400 miles from the reservation,
Spitzer said the project is in the best interest of the state.
"This agreement creates an economic partnership between the Mohawks
and the people of New York," Spitzer said. "By working together, we
can establish a premier gaming facility the will produce significant
revenues for the tribe and the state, and help spark a resurgence of
the Catskills region."
In some major concessions, the tribe has agreed to share
up to 25 percent of slot machine revenues with the state and
has agreed to comply with all local laws.
That means the tribe will collect state taxes on the sale of
all goods -- including tobacco -- sold at the casino.
"We rejoice in the prospects this important project presents for the
future of the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, the people of Sullivan County,
and New Yorkers across the state," the council said in a statement.
But bigger issues lie ahead for project, which has been years in
the making.
The tribe and the state have to lobby the Bush administration
to approve the land-into-trust application for the 30-acre
site.
That task is typically a major undertaking. A Government
Accountability Study found that the tribes have had to wait
several years, or even longer, before seeing action on their requests.
For the Mohawks and Spitzer, the effort is further complicated
by the views of Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, who has
been on the job less than a year.
As governor of Idaho, he adamantly opposed off-reservation
gaming.
"We're in the process of trying to reconcile his views as governor and his
activities as governor with his role as secretary," Interior's associate deputy
secretary, said at the United South and Eastern Tribes
(USET) annual winter meeting in Washington, D.C. last week.
The Mohawks belong to USET.
In December, Cason sent nearly identical
letters to the tribe and the state that warned of the dangers
of pursuing an off-reservation casino.
Members of Congress have sought to restrict or otherwise
prohibit "reservation shopping" though they were unable
to get any measures passed due to opposition from Indian Country.
One of the major arguments against amending IGRA is
the fact that the law's off-reservation provisions
have been used rarely in the history of tribal gaming.
Since 1988, only three tribes -- the Forest County Potawatomi Tribe of
Wisconsin, the Kalispel Tribe of Washington and the Keweenaw Bay
Indian Community in Michigan -- have won federal and
state approval for casinos away from existing reservations.
Even rarer is the use of a land claim settlement.
Only one tribe -- the Seneca Nation, also of New York --
has been able to open a casino under this provision of IGRA.
The Mohawks have a land claim but pursued their Catskills
casino under the two-part determination provision of IGRA,
which requires state and federal approval. Land claims
face another hurdle in that Congress must
pass legislation to ratify any settlements.
Despite this history, dozens of tribes are currently pursuing
proposals to open casinos on land far from existing
reservations and, in some cases, in other states.
At the USET meeting last week,
Cason said the BIA has put a higher priority on these
applications though none have advanced as far as the
Mohawks.
The BIA is also finalizing work on regulations that
govern how land acquisitions for casinos will be handled.
The Section 20 rules could be finalized this spring,
according to officials.
New York Announcement:
STATE AUTHORIZES CATSKILL CASINO (February 19, 2007)
Interior Letter:
Jim Cason to St. Regis
Mohawk Tribe (December 21, 2006)
Section 20 Regulations:
Notice of
Extension |
Text |
PDF
NIGA Resolutions:
Section
20 |
IGRA
Amendments
Relevant Links:
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe -
http://srmt-nsn.gov
National Indian Gaming Association -
http://www.indiangaming.org
Related Stories:
Off-reservation gaming concerns at Interior
(2/16)
BIA continues work on
gaming land regulation (12/04)
Case
blocking out-of-state casino dismissed (11/06)
Michigan tribe gets land-into-trust date in
2007 (11/03)
Another GAO report looks at
land-into-trust (10/25)
Tribal gaming
still faces challenges in Congress (10/09)
BIA publishes rules for Section 20 gaming
acquisitions (10/5)
NIGC's Class II
rules come under fire from tribes (9/20)
Editorial: Pombo's RIGHT Act fails to live up to
its name (09/14)
Controversial IGRA bill
fails on House floor (9/13)
IGRA bill up
for big vote on House floor (9/12)
Indian gaming act amendments face time crunch
(07/31)
House committee approves IGRA
amendments (7/27)
NIGA opposes
Rep. Pombo's IGRA amendments (7/27)
Tribal
gaming revenues reach $23 billion (7/12)
Bush administration pushes Class II gaming
proposal (06/20)
IGRA amendments sent to
Senate floor (6/16)
Report cites impact,
growth of tribal gaming in California (06/01)
NIGC releases draft of casino licensing
regulations (05/19)
Indianz.Com launches
Casino Stalker to track casinos (05/15)
Group's list inflates off-reservation gaming
proposals (04/20)
NIGA supports gaming
rules but opposes McCain bill (04/11)
BIA expects more off-reservation gaming
applications (4/6)
BIA holds
consultation on Section 20 regulations (3/31)
Tribal gaming industry due for some changes
(3/30)
BIA sets meetings for Section 20
regulations (3/28)
Off-reservation
casino sites still in question (3/16)
Listening Lounge: Hearing on
off-reservation gaming (3/15)
BIA sets
timetable for new gaming regulations (03/01)
Senate panel presses BIA on gaming regulations
(02/02)
BIA takes stab at land-into-trust
for gaming rules (2/1)
Witness
list for hearing on off-reservation gaming (1/31)
Senate panel delves into gaming again for 2006
(01/25)
Lobbying reform, gaming high on
Congressional agenda (01/20)
Appeals
court sides with tribe in trust land dispute (01/09)
IGRA amendments tough on many, especially
tribes (12/12)
Oklahoma tribe hires
ex-BIA official to lobby for land (12/01)
McCain proposes major amendments to IGRA
(11/30)
NIGC adopts new approach for tribal
gaming sites (11/14)
Tribes dispute
local power over trust land decisions (11/10)
DOJ releases proposed changes to Indian gaming
law (10/06)
DOJ gaming proposal
shows changes to Johnson Act (10/05)
BIA
official revives off-reservation land regulations (09/21)
DOJ proposes major change in Indian gaming law
(09/16)
Gaming clouds already lengthy
land-into-trust process (09/15)
Oklahoma
tribe plans state's largest gaming facility (08/02)
NIGC develops system to track Indian lands
(07/28)
Perception and realities in
land-into-trust debate (05/19)
Land into
trust to be examined at Senate hearing (5/10)
Land-into-trust problems aired at Senate hearing
(4/28)
Update: Senate hearing on Indian
gaming (04/27)
BIA backs bill to delay
off-reservation casino (04/06)
Off-reservation casinos a concern at gaming
summit (03/30)
Bush stance on
off-reservation gaming unknown (03/29)
Exceptions to IGRA more common than often cited
(03/21)
Off-reservation casino dropped as
debate continues (03/21)
Off-reservation
gaming hearing set by Pombo (3/15)
Agencies still in conflict over off-reservation
gaming (12/07)
McCaleb calls Chickasaws
savvy, not deceptive (10/26)
Official
tells Chickasaw land-into-trust tactics (10/25)
Cole says Chickasaw Nation made promises on
land (09/16)
BIA approves compact for
gaming on former reservation (03/25)
Chickasaw Nation land purchases quadruple
(03/23)
Hogen says Okla. tribes
skirting federal gaming law (05/19)
Indian gaming law not always followed
(5/14)
Okla. tribe
leaps over Indian gaming hurdles (04/23)
Chickasaw Nation 'followed the
law' (6/28)
Tribe's land
approvals questioned (6/11)
Copyright © Indianz.Com