Land-into-trust requests fall into BIA's 'black hole'
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Filed Under:
Politics
What happens when a tribe submits a land-into-trust application to the Bureau of Indian Affairs?
Tribal leaders hope it will be processed in a timely manner. But in the face of lengthy waits, many are wondering what is going on at the agency that is charged with serving their
needs.
"The message we're getting is just there is no movement," said Brenda Litinger, a council member for the Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana, at the United South and Eastern Tribes (USET) meeting last week.
Litinger said her tribe wants to have land placed in trust for non-gaming purposes. That shouldn't be controversial but there's been no action for a couple of years, she told Jim Cason, the associate deputy secretary at the Interior Department.
"We are being hindered by this delay, by this black hole," Litinger said last Wednesday.
Christine Norris, the chief of the Jena Band of Choctaw Indians in Louisiana, shared a similar story. As a recently recognized tribe, the Choctaws are waiting for Interior to make a "reservation proclamation" for their initial land base.
But Norris said she has no idea what is happening with the application now that it has been sent to the BIA's central office in Washington, D.C. "I am not getting any response, any telephone calls returned," she told Cason.
"It seems as if it's fallen into a black hole," Norris added.
A couple of days later, the tribes' fears were compounded by the testimony of the Government Accountability Office. At the first hearing of the House Natural Resources Committee on Friday, lawmakers were told that the land-into-trust process is only getting worse.
"Over 1,000 land in trust applications from tribes and individual Indians are currently pending," said Robin Nazarro, the director of natural resources and Environment at the GAO.
That's up from the "hundreds" a BIA official told a Senate committee back in May 2005.
According to the GAO, the median processing time for a land-into-trust application is 1.2 years. But one tribe waited 13 years and another waited 19 years to receive an answer.
Since the Indian Reorganization Act, the law that created the land-into-trust process, does not impose timelines on the BIA, the agency can take as long as it wants to complete the process.
At the USET meeting, Cason confirmed that some tribes will have to wait longer than others due to limited staff and controversies associated with Indian gaming.
Cason said that non-gaming applications are being handled after gaming and gaming-related applications. He also cited problems with the BIA's land title system and inaccurate or missing data. One regional office in Oklahoma wasn't even entering any of its data into the system, according to a GAO report.
"I had to set some priorities ... and in setting the priorities, new land-into-trust ended up being a lower priority," Cason told attendees of USET.
The BIA is currently revamping its land-into-trust processes but again, gaming acquisitions have been given a higher priority. The agency's "Section 20" regulations -- named for the section of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act -- are due to be finalized this spring.
The "151" regulations -- named for a section of the Code of Federal Regulations that affect non-gaming acquisitions -- are still on the back burner. In 2001, the Bush administration rescinded a set of rules that, for the first time, would have imposed deadlines on
the BIA.
Government Accountability Office Testimony:
Department of the Interior: Major Management Challenges
(February 16, 2007)
Government Accountability Office Report:
BIA's Efforts to
Impose Time Frames and Collect Better Data Should Improve the Processing of Land
in Trust Applications |
Highlights
Interior Department Inspector General Evaluation Report:
Process Used to
Assess Applications to Take Land Into Trust for Gaming Purposes (September
2005)
Related Stories:
Appeals court to hear land-into-trust case
(01/08)
Appeals court to rehear land-into-trust
dispute (12/07)
BIA continues work on gaming land regulation
(12/04)
Land-into-trust report points to tribe's
impact (11/27)
Michigan tribe gets land-into-trust date in
2007 (11/03)
Interior delays latest trust reform
regulations (11/01)
Another GAO report looks at land-into-trust
(10/25)
GAO finds lengthy delays on land-into-trust
(8/28)
Interior releases new
probate and land regulations (08/09)
Interior Department big on new regulations
(04/24)
Legislation won't address all
land-into-trust issues (04/05)
BIA holds
consultation on Section 20 regulations (3/31)
BIA sets meetings for Section 20 regulations
(3/28)
Off-reservation casino sites
still in question (3/16)
Listening Lounge: Hearing on
off-reservation gaming (3/15)
BIA sets
timetable for new gaming regulations (03/01)
Senate panel presses BIA on gaming regulations
(02/02)
BIA takes stab at land-into-trust
for gaming rules (2/1)
Witness
list for hearing on off-reservation gaming (1/31)
Senate panel delves into gaming again for 2006
(01/25)
Lobbying reform, gaming high on
Congressional agenda (01/20)
Appeals
court sides with tribe in trust land dispute (01/09)
IGRA amendments tough on many, especially
tribes (12/12)
Oklahoma tribe hires
ex-BIA official to lobby for land (12/01)
McCain proposes major amendments to IGRA
(11/30)
NIGC adopts new approach for tribal
gaming sites (11/14)
Tribes dispute
local power over trust land decisions (11/10)
DOJ releases proposed changes to Indian gaming
law (10/06)
DOJ gaming proposal
shows changes to Johnson Act (10/05)
BIA
official revives off-reservation land regulations (09/21)
DOJ proposes major change in Indian gaming law
(09/16)
Gaming clouds already lengthy
land-into-trust process (09/15)
Oklahoma
tribe plans state's largest gaming facility (08/02)
NIGC develops system to track Indian lands
(07/28)
Perception and realities in
land-into-trust debate (05/19)
Land into
trust to be examined at Senate hearing (5/10)
Land-into-trust problems aired at Senate hearing
(4/28)
Update: Senate hearing on Indian
gaming (04/27)
BIA backs bill to delay
off-reservation casino (04/06)
Off-reservation casinos a concern at gaming
summit (03/30)
Bush stance on
off-reservation gaming unknown (03/29)
Exceptions to IGRA more common than often cited
(03/21)
Off-reservation casino dropped as
debate continues (03/21)
Off-reservation
gaming hearing set by Pombo (3/15)
Agencies still in conflict over off-reservation
gaming (12/07)
McCaleb calls Chickasaws
savvy, not deceptive (10/26)
Official
tells Chickasaw land-into-trust tactics (10/25)
Cole says Chickasaw Nation made promises on
land (09/16)
BIA approves compact for
gaming on former reservation (03/25)
Chickasaw Nation land purchases quadruple
(03/23)
Hogen says Okla. tribes
skirting federal gaming law (05/19)
Indian gaming law not always followed
(5/14)
Okla. tribe
leaps over Indian gaming hurdles (04/23)
Chickasaw Nation 'followed the
law' (6/28)
Tribe's land
approvals questioned (6/11)
Copyright © Indianz.Com
Subscribe