Cherokee Nation reacts to BIA rejection of constitution
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Filed Under:
National
The leader of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma vowed
a fight with the Bureau of Indian Affairs on Tuesday
as controversy over the tribe's removal of African
descendants continued.
Cherokee Chief Chad Smith said the tribe would take
"all appropriate steps" to defend its right to
self-determination.
He accused the BIA of overturning 30 years of federal policy
and court decisions after the agency asserted
a role in reviewing the tribe's constitution.
"What is at stake here is the sovereignty and self-determination
of all Indian tribes," Smith said.
"The BIA is calling into question the right of Indians to be
able to decide, through the exercise of their cherished
democratic freedoms, the content of their own constitutions."
The tribe adopted a constitution in 1976 that required
the BIA to review any changes.
In 2003, Cherokee voters approved an amendment to
remove the federal review provision.
But assistant secretary Carl Artman informed
Smith on Monday that the Interior Department was rejecting
the 2003 amendment.
In a letter, Artman said he respected the tribe's
ability to govern itself but voiced concerns
about the Cherokee Freedmen,
whose ancestors became members of the tribe
by an 1866 treaty.
The Freedmen weren't directly at issue in the 2003 vote but
Artman said he was rejecting the amendment because
it could be used to validate their removal.
In March, Cherokee voters changed the constitution yet again
to preclude the descendants of African slaves
from citizenship.
"Therefore, I cannot approve the 2003 amendment
knowing it may provide the basis for violating the terms
and intent of the 1866 treaty," Artman wrote.
In a follow-up interview, Artman said he acted because
the Freedmen weren't able to vote on the 2003
amendment. It wasn't until March 2006 that the tribe's
highest court ruled the Freedmen were entitled
to citizenship.
"That was our concern with the 2003 amendment,"
Artman said.
Artman stressed that his letter has no bearing on
the BIA's government-to-government relationship
with the Cherokee Nation.
He said the agency has no plans to cut off funding
to the tribe, as the Freedmen have sought in federal court.
"Nothing changes," Artman said.
The BIA, however, intervened in a similar dispute
when the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma changed its
constitution to deny citizenship to its Freedmen.
The agency cut off funding to the tribe and refused
to recognize the results of an election until
the Freedmen were restored.
The Cherokee Freedmen have pointed to the BIA's
actions in the Seminole case in support of their
position. But Artman said there are differences in
the situations, although he wasn't able to go into them in detail.
"There are distinctions between the Cherokee case and the Seminole
case," he said.
The Freedmen initially sued the Interior Department
over the 2003 election, in which Chief Smith was
re-elected. Only later was
the Cherokee Nation added to the case
by Judge Henry H. Kennedy in Washington, D.C.,
who cited the 1866 treaty and the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,
which outlawed slavery.
Smith is running again for re-election but the tribe
has agreed to an order in tribal court to allow
the Freedmen to vote in the upcoming June vote.
Stacy Leeds, a former Cherokee judge who wrote the decision
that affirmed the Freedmen's right to citizenship,
is running against Smith.
BIA Letters:
May 21, 2007 |
March 28, 2007 |
August 30, 2006
Sovereign Immunity Court Decision:
Vann v. Kempthorne (December 19,
2006)
Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal Decision in Freedmen
Case:
Allen
v. Cherokee Nation (March 7, 2006)
Relevant Links:
Cherokee Nation -
http://www.cherokee.orgFreedmen
Of The Five Civilized Tribes -
http://www.freedmen5tribes.comFreedmen
Conference -
http://www.freedmenconference.com
Related Stories:
BIA rejects 2003 Cherokee Nation constitution
(5/22)
Cherokee Nation
worried about Freedmen fallout (5/18)
Cherokee Freedmen restored to membership for now
(5/15)
Cherokee Freedmen protest ouster
from tribe (5/14)
Cherokee leader:
Freedmen case not winnable (5/11)
Cherokee Freedmen back in court over ouster
(5/11)
Freedmen ouster stirs passions at
law conference (4/26)
Cherokee Nation
considers anti-Freedmen funds (4/18)
Cherokee Nation chief took money from Abramoff
(4/12)
Freedmen protest removal at BIA
office in Oklahoma (4/11)
Rolo: Cherokee
Nation blasted for ousting Freedmen (4/4)
Graham: Cherokee Nation tarred with 'racist' label
(4/2)
Cherokee Freedmen protest ouster
from tribe (3/28)
Opinion: Ouster of
Freedmen is Cherokee business (3/23)
Opinion: Outrage over ouster of Cherokee Freedmen
(3/22)
Marilyn Vann: Loss of Cherokee
Nation citizenship (3/21)
Website
Review: The revolt of the Black Seminoles (3/20)
Column: Freedmen still slaves to Cherokee Nation
(3/19)
Opinion: Cherokees have a right
to oust Freedmen (3/19)
Opinion:
Cherokee Freedmen play the race card (3/19)
Opinion: Racism exists within Cherokee Nation
(3/15)
Congressional Black Caucus backs
Freedmen (3/14)
Tim Giago: Cherokee
Nation votes out Freedmen (3/12)
Opinion: Cherokee Nation ignores own treaty
(3/12)
Opinion: Cherokee Nation takes
the lower road (3/12)
Chad Smith:
Cherokee Nation tolerant of many (3/9)
Column: Cherokee Nation loses moral ground with
vote (3/9)
Editorial: Ouster of Freedmen
a low point for Cherokees (3/8)
Freedmen
to challenge ouster, Cherokee funding (3/7)
Commentary: Cherokee blood spread far and wide
(3/7)
Slate: What's so good about being
Cherokee? (3/6)
Cherokee Nation kicks
out Freedmen descendants (3/5)
Cherokee
Nation heads to polls to decide on Freedmen (3/2)
Chad Smith: Cherokee Nation not based on race
(3/2)
Editorial: Ouster of Freedmen a
sign of elitism, fear (3/2)
Voice of
America: Cherokees to vote on Freedmen (2/27)
Judge won't halt Cherokee Freedmen vote (2/22)
Freedmen in court to halt Cherokee Nation
vote (2/21)
Freedmen ask federal court
to halt Cherokee election (2/5)
Cherokees
in California want to be part of community (01/16)
Ouster of Cherokee Freedmen an issue in California
(1/15)
Election to oust Cherokee
Freedmen delayed (1/3)
Cherokee Freedmen
win ruling against tribe (12/20)
Cherokee
Chief: Tribe to vote on Indian blood (12/06)
USA Today: Tribes remove thousands from rolls
(11/29)
Cherokee court hears dispute
over Freedmen vote (11/27)
Cherokee
court to consider Freedmen referendum (11/20)
Freedmen descendant sues over citizenship
change (11/03)
Cherokee Freedmen to
challenge removal (10/10)
Cherokee chief
calls vote on removing Freedmen (10/9)
Cherokees defend right to kick Freedmen out of
tribe (09/21)
Cherokee chief rejects
need to approve constitution (09/11)
Cherokee Nation questioned on Freedmen vote
(9/7)
Petition to oust Cherokee Freedmen
submitted (08/15)
Petition seeks vote on
ousting Cherokee Freedmen (07/31)
Cherokee Nation to vote on blood quantum change
(6/13)
Cherokee Nation council debates blood
quantum (6/12)
Cherokee Nation's top
court approves constitution (6/9)
Cherokee committee approves membership proposal
(05/16)
About 800 Cherokee Freedmen enrolled
since decision (05/01)
Cherokee chief
sued over vacant legal position (04/13)
Cherokee chief criticized for stance on Freedmen
(4/6)
Two Creek Freedmen apply for
citizenship after ruling (03/22)
Creek
Freedmen see opening in citizenship dispute (3/21)
Cherokee chief calls for an 'Indian' Nation by
blood (3/20)
Cherokee chief criticized
for stance on Freedmen (3/17)
Cherokee
chief wants Freedmen out of tribe (3/15)
Editorial: Victory long overdue for Cherokee
Freedmen (3/10)
Cherokee Nation to
enroll Freedmen descendants (3/9)
Cherokee Freedmen win tribal citizenship lawsuit
(3/8)
Cherokee chief wants to sue BIA
over constitution (02/15)
Freedmen
descendants shut out of Cherokee Nation (11/22)
Trial concludes in Freedmen membership case
(09/15)
DNA tests being used to bolster
Indian heritage claims (08/30)
Ex-Cherokee councilors fined for Freedmen
support (08/23)
Freedmen descendants use
DNA to show Indian blood (06/03)
Column:
Civilized Tribes owe reparations to slaves (03/11)
Cherokee Nation seeks role in Freedmen lawsuit
(02/21)
Cherokee leaders blast Coburn for
'divisive' remarks (9/17)
Cherokee
Freedmen caught in high-level dispute (8/20)
Cherokee Nation chief sworn in for another term
(8/15)
Seminole Freedmen rebuffed by
Supreme Court (06/29)
Cherokee
Freedmen sue BIA for disenfranchisement (8/12)
Court tackles Seminole dispute
(9/24)
The Seminole
Nation's hanging chad (8/8)
Resolution of Seminole dispute
sought in court (5/28)
Court
decision rocks Seminole Nation (5/8)
Seminole's Chief Haney restored to
power (5/7)
Black Seminole
appeal planned (5/1)
Black
Seminoles dealt setback (4/30)
Opinion: Seminole Nation always
black (4/22)
A fight over
funds, race (4/4)
Seminole
Head Start funds OKed (2/6)
Seminole changes sought again
(1/16)
Ousted Seminole leader
sues tribe, BIA (12/14)
Black
Seminole issue still divisive (10/29)
Suspended Seminole Chief to sue
(6/27)
Seminole Chief Haney
suspended (6/26)
Race part of
Seminole dispute (1/29)
Seminole
voters approve changes (7/7)
Seminole vote may affect Freedmen
(7/7)
Copyright © Indianz.Com
Subscribe