Joe Martin: Tribal jurisdiction over non-Indians
Thursday, May 1, 2008
Filed Under:
Opinion
"On April 14, the Supreme Court heard the case Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co. It’s a case where a cattle farmer, a member of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, fell upon hard times one winter, losing his livestock. The bank foreclosed (using the tribe’s court), and sold his property to a non-Indian at a better rate than was offered to the Longs. The Longs sued alleging breach of contract and discrimination and won in tribal court. The bank in turn appealed, claiming that the courts lacked civil jurisdiction, losing at every level up to the Supreme Court.
The court could uphold tribal civil jurisdiction, but the case could have a devastating impact on Indian country. The potential negative rulings are that non-Indian and tribal entities must consent to tribal civil jurisdiction. The court could rule that tribes have no jurisdiction over non-Indians, civil or criminal. Either of those could severely hamper commerce and any business dealings between tribal members and non-Indians (like the Eastern Band of Cherokee and Harrah’s).
Since divorces, child custody agreements and protective orders all are civil remedies, any ruling that limits tribal civil jurisdiction would remove the only legal protection many tribal members have.
Woody Woodring, who charged into a women’s shelter in Sylva, killing his wife, was once married to a member of the Eastern Cherokee. Imagine what could she have done if the tribe had no civil jurisdiction in her case? The court must uphold tribal civil jurisdiction and should revisit the Oliphant decision."
Get the Story:
Joe Martin: Supreme Court must uphold tribal civil jurisdiction
(The Asheville Citizen-Times 5/1)
Relevant Documents:
Oral
Argument Transcript |
Docket Sheet:
No. 07-411 |
Briefs
on the Merits
Appeals Court Decision:
Plains
Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land and Cattle Company (June 26, 2007)
Lower Court Decision:
Plains
Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land and Cattle Company (July 18, 2006)
Related Stories:
Opinion: Disrespect at the Supreme Court
(4/28)
Supreme Court hears
tribal jurisdiction case (4/15)
Legal
Times: Italians and Indians at high court (4/15)
Supreme Court to hear jurisdiction case (4/14)
DOJ to join argument in tribal court
jurisdiction case (4/3)
Bush brief backs
tribal court jurisdiction (3/24)
Opinion: No tribal jurisdiction over non-Indians
(3/3)
Supreme Court agrees to hear tribal
jurisdiction case (1/8)
Appeals court
upholds tribal verdict in bank loan case (6/28)
9th Circuit vacates tribal jurisdiction ruling
(2/2)
Court subjects non-Indian bank to
tribal laws (7/20)
Appeals court upholds
tribal jurisdiction after rehearing (01/11)
Copyright © Indianz.Com
Subscribe