Supreme Court cuts down Exxon oil spill damages
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Filed Under:
Environment
|
Law
The
U.S. Supreme Court today drastically reduced the damage award in the
1989 Exxon
Valdez oil spill case.
A federal judge awarded $5 billion to 33,000 Alaska Natives, fishermen, landowners and other plaintiffs. The
9th Circuit Court of Appeals subsequently cut the award to $2.5 billion.
In
Exxon
v. Baker, the Supreme Court said the reduced award was too high. Based on compensation already paid, the majority said the plaintiffs are owed $500 million.
The vote on the damages was 5-3. Justice Samuel Alito did not take part in the case because he owns
Exxon stock.
Get the Story:
Court slashes judgment in Exxon Valdez disaster (AP 6/25)
Username:
indianz@indianz.com, Password:
indianz
Supreme Court Decision:
Syllabus |
Opinion [Souter] |
Concurrence [Scalia] |
Concurence/Dissent [Stevens] |
Concurence/Dissent [Ginsburg] |
Concurence/Dissent [Breyer]
Related Stories:
Supreme Court hears Exxon Valdez oil spill
case (2/28)
Supreme Court agrees to hear
Exxon oil spill case (10/30)
Court won't
reconsider $2.5B Exxon Valdez award (5/24)
Alaska Natives seek $100M for Exxon Valdez oil
spill (5/2)
Judge orders Exxon to pay
$7B for Valdez spill (1/29)
Exxon wants oil spill award
reduced (06/13)
Alaska
Natives appeal Exxon ruling (11/30)
Exxon fight has proven costly
(11/9)
Native payout for Exxon
spill lowered (11/8)
Exxon
Valdez health complaints probed (11/6)
Copyright © Indianz.Com