Editorial: Progress in retiring 'Fighting Sioux'
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Filed Under:
Education
|
Opinion
"As of Thursday, the North Dakota Board of Higher Education has officially approved a plan of action for addressing the Fighting Sioux nickname battle, something that has been in the waiting room since a settlement was reached with the NCAA last November. The proposal was introduced by board member Duaine Espegard and was passed with the addition of a few amendments. The changes were based mostly on wording issues and additional amendments stating that the proposal was subject to change based on scheduling abilities by the athletic teams. So, after a year of waiting on the State Board, they have finally laid forth steps to be taken in order to officially seek permission from two North Dakota tribes.
In the proposal, a committee consisting of the state's top governmental officials will need to be formed by January 2009 in order to meet with tribal leaders and, if nickname approval does not seem forthcoming by Jan. 2010, then a transition team will be formed for the university in order to prepare for the name change.The proposal also confirmed that it was the board's responsibility to acquire permission, and not UND's.
So it seems that, at last, the state board took the pressure off of UND as the supposed responsible player in the continued nickname saga in the year that they have had since the settlement to take action. Since the transition the action on the nickname had been foggy as to who should be responsible, and when responsibility was finally laid upon the state board they did nothing for a year. It seemed that it wasn't until Chancellor William Goetz stated that either something should be done or the state board should drop the fight that the wheels actually started to turn towards progress.'
Get the Story:
Editorial: Progress
(The Dakota Student 10/21)
Related Stories:
Editorial: Preparing for the end of 'Fighting
Sioux' (10/20)
Opinion: Internal racism and
'Fighting Sioux' (10/16)
Letter: Tribe
should negotiate 'Fighting Sioux' (10/10)
North Dakota won't revive 'Fighting Sioux' lawsuit
(10/9)
Protest against tribal flags at
'Fighting Sioux' arena (10/6)
Letter:
'Sioux' name not for sale to anyone (10/3)
Opinion: Protest against 'Fighting Sioux' event
(10/2)
'Fighting Sioux' arena to display
tribal flags (9/29)
Column: Former
'Fighting Sioux' diehard relents (9/22)
NBA coach urges end to 'Fighting Sioux' nick
(8/26)
Responses: Still saying no to
'Fighting Sioux' (8/25)
Opinion: No
movement on future of 'Sioux' nick (8/18)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe bars vote on 'Sioux'
nickname (6/4)
UND poster campaign
boycotted over 'Sioux' (03/13)
Opinion:
No victory in taking back 'Sioux' name (3/24)
Opinion: 'Fighting Sioux' promotes racism
(3/10)
Committee on 'Fighting Sioux'
being formed (3/4)
Committee to examine
'Fighting Sioux' name (2/28)
North
Dakota tribes tired of 'Sioux' talks (2/22)
North Dakota board to hear about 'Sioux' talks
(2/20)
Spirit Lake Nation asked to delay
'Sioux' vote (2/15)
UND postpones
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe meeting (02/06)
Spirit Lake Nation weighs vote on 'Sioux' nickname
(2/4)
Opinion: Sioux who support
'Fighting Sioux' (1/24)
North Dakota
official to meet with tribes over 'Sioux' (1/17)
Opinion: UND's 'Fighting Sioux' not insulting
(1/11)
Opinion: Honor in 'Fighting
Sioux' nickname (12/24)
'Fighting Sioux'
not going away any time soon (12/21)
Opinion: What do Sioux tribes win in UND fight?
(12/17)
North Dakota board to discuss
'Fighting Sioux' (12/13)
Opinion:
History repeats itself on 'Fighting Sioux' (12/10)
Copyright © Indianz.Com
Subscribe