Editorial: At last, a settlement to Cobell trust case
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Filed Under:
Cobell
|
Opinion
"For the last 13 years, the case of Cobell v. Salazar has wound its way through the United States District Court for the District of Columbia like a latter-day version of Dickens’s Jarndyce v. Jarndyce. The defendants — the secretaries of interior, Treasury, and the Interior Department’s chief of Indian affairs — have changed over the years, and so has the judge. Now, at last, a settlement has been reached. The federal government has agreed to pay $3.4 billion to settle claims that it had shortchanged accounts it has held in trust since the 19th century for hundreds of thousands of American Indians.
The agreement would pay $1.4 billion directly to individual holders of the trusts. It would also set up a $2 billion fund to buy fractional shares in the trusts from willing sellers in an effort to consolidate fragments of tribal land into more profitable holdings.
Elouise Cobell, the lead plaintiff and most visible symbol in the case, said she thought the Indians were owed more. But, she acknowledged, the number of elderly claimants had dwindled and further litigation would only mean the deaths of more of the very people who were meant to benefit from the trusts.
The trusts are a legacy of an 1887 law that divided some tribal lands among individuals and placed the lands in federally administered trusts. The federal government then leased the land for mining, grazing and other purposes, returning the proceeds to the trusts. Over time, records were lost, mishandled and destroyed, and the trusts were divided into tinier and tinier pieces as they were passed down to descendants."
Get the Story:
Editorial: Settling Indian Trusts
(The New York Times 12/15)
Relevant Documents:
Agreement
|
Press
Release |
Q&A
|
Audio
Related Stories:
North Dakota tribes back settlement in Cobell
case (12/14)
Opinion: Indian plaintiff won't see trust
settlement (12/14)
Column: Navajo woman helped resolve Cobell case
(12/14)
Editorial: Preventing future trust mismanagement
(12/14)
Editorial: Approve settlement to Cobell trust
case (12/14)
Senate committee sets
Cobell settlement hearing (12/11)
Washington tribes react to Cobell case settlement
(12/11)
Editorial: Land consolidation
program 'worrisome' (12/11)
Lynne
Harlan: A new era in federal Indian relations (12/11)
Column: Cowboy banks got paid more than Indians
(12/11)
Editorial: Settling more than a
century of injustice (12/11)
Editorial:
Support settlement for Cobell trust case (12/11)
Editorial: Acknowledge past mistakes in trust fund
(12/11)
Editorial: A long overdue
settlement to Cobell suit (12/11)
NARF
welcomes settlement in Cobell trust lawsuit (12/10)
Cobell hailed as warrior as she returns to Montana
(12/10)
Billings Paper: Cobell deal
sends $27M to Montana (12/10)
Editorial:
Cobell settlement fair for Indian Country (12/10)
Editorial: Welcome settlement to Cobell trust case
(12/10)
Mostly praise for $3.4B
settlement to Cobell lawsuit (12/9)
Editorial: Act quickly on Indian trust fund
settlement (12/9)
Twitter Recap of
Cobell settlement with Photos (12/8)
Statement by President Obama on Cobell settlement
(12/8)
Statement by Sen. Dorgan on
Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by
Sen. McCain on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Tester on Cobell settlement
(12/8)
Statement by Rep. Rahall on Cobell
settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Cole
and Rep. Kildee on Cobell settlement (12/8)
'Major' announcement on Indian trust management
(12/8)
Copyright © Indianz.Com
Subscribe