Indianz.Com > News > Opinion: Cobell trust settlement addresses land issues

Opinion: Cobell trust settlement addresses land issues
Monday, February 1, 2010
Filed Under: Cobell | Opinion

"The close of 2009 saw resolution of a nearly invisible but monumental problem facing America’s first, and one of its most disadvantaged, populations. The settlement of Cobell v. Salazar, a lawsuit initiated 14 years ago by Elouise Cobell, a Blackfeet tribal member, community leader and former treasurer of the Blackfeet Nation, is an important step toward righting injustices perpetuated for more than a century.

Private ownership of land was virtually unknown in American Indian culture. U.S. government-sanctioned expansion westward was framed in part by the notion that the “Indian problem” was best dealt with by introducing “among the Indians the customs and pursuits of civilized life and gradually absorb them into the mass of our citizens” (President Chester A. Arthur, 1884). Tribal lands were divided into parcels ranging from 40 to 160 acres, with allotments made to tribal members. Much of the nonallotted land was sold to non-natives at rock-bottom prices in one of our nation’s greatest land grabs, with better than 89 million acres disposed of by the government in this fashion.

The United States was mandated, under the Dawes Act (1887), to hold allotted lands in trust for the benefit of tribal members, managing them and investing into individual accounts any funds received. Numerous studies have documented ineptitude and corruption in the management of those funds. Few if any of the beneficiaries have been provided with adequate information about their funds, or have been able to realize any monies from the accounts.

What was initially a 25-year trust evolved into perpetuity, rather than giving tribal members outright ownership when the 25 years expired. What failed to evolve was any system of inheritance. As original “owners” passed on, ownership interests passed on to all heirs in equal undivided shares (wills were uncommon on reservations). A 40-acre allotment in 1890 could now have more than 100 owners. For each new owner, a new trust account would have to be established. As early as 1922, a report from the GAO (now called the Government Accountability Office) found that for 80,000 established parcels, there were at least a million associated ownership interests."

Get the Story:
Robert Young: 120-year-old policy still hinders home ownership on reservations (The Billings Gazette 2/1)

Relevant Documents:
Agreement | Press Release | Q&A | Audio

Related Stories:
Dennis Gingold: The facts behind trust fund settlement (1/29)
Bill Martin: No rubber stamp for trust fund settlement (1/26)
Editorial: Congress must act fast on Cobell settlement (1/22)
Chickasaw firm secures land consolidation contract (1/21)
Opinion: Indian trust beneficiaries finally getting paid? (1/20)
Interview with Elliott Levitas, attorney for Cobell case (1/18)
Millions coming to Montana under Cobell settlement (01/07)
Congress gets more time to act on Cobell settlement (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell lawsuit (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell lawsuit (1/6)
Letters: A good settlement to Indian trust fund case (12/21)
Cobell urges Senate to move quickly on settlement (12/18)
Column: Free Indians of federal government control (12/18)
Column: Cobell deal not so great for Indian Country (12/18)
Editorial: Cobell deal corrects century-old old wrong (12/18)
Editorial: Settlement and accountability in trust fund (12/18)
Witness List: Senate hearing on Cobell settlement (12/16)
Mary Pember: The small picture of the Cobell deal (12/16)
Opinion: Deal won't change much in Indian Country (12/16)
Editorial: Settlement in Cobell case is long overdue (12/16)
Editorial: Act quickly to approve Cobell settlement (12/16)
Bill Means: Cobell settlement a rip-off for Indians (12/15)
Editorial: At last a settlement in Cobell trust case (12/15)
North Dakota tribes back settlement in Cobell case (12/14)
Opinion: Indian plaintiff won't see trust settlement (12/14)
Column: Navajo woman helped resolve Cobell case (12/14)
Editorial: Preventing future trust mismanagement (12/14)
Editorial: Approve settlement to Cobell trust case (12/14)
Senate committee sets Cobell settlement hearing (12/11)
Washington tribes react to Cobell case settlement (12/11)
Editorial: Land consolidation program 'worrisome' (12/11)
Lynne Harlan: A new era in federal Indian relations (12/11)
Column: Cowboy banks got paid more than Indians (12/11)
Editorial: Settling more than a century of injustice (12/11)
Editorial: Support settlement for Cobell trust case (12/11)
Editorial: Acknowledge past mistakes in trust fund (12/11)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell suit (12/11)
NARF welcomes settlement in Cobell trust lawsuit (12/10)
Cobell hailed as warrior as she returns to Montana (12/10)
Billings Paper: Cobell deal sends $27M to Montana (12/10)
Editorial: Cobell settlement fair for Indian Country (12/10)
Editorial: Welcome settlement to Cobell trust case (12/10)
Mostly praise for $3.4B settlement to Cobell lawsuit (12/9)
Editorial: Act quickly on Indian trust fund settlement (12/9)
Twitter Recap of Cobell settlement with Photos (12/8)
Statement by President Obama on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Dorgan on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. McCain on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Tester on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Rahall on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Cole and Rep. Kildee on Cobell settlement (12/8)
'Major' announcement on Indian trust management (12/8)