Home > News > Headlines

printer friendly version
Miccosukee Tribe's case tests Supreme Court justices
Thursday, January 15, 2004

Several Supreme Court justices seemed to question on Wednesday whether they should force a water district in Florida to stop pumping dirty water into the Miccosukee Tribe's homelands.

According to news reports, a majority were worried about the national implications. Two justices -- Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer -- appeared to agree with the tribe's stance.

The tribe argues that the South Florida Water Management District needs a federal permit to move polluted water into the Everglades. The district, supported by the Bush administration, says it isn't creating any new pollution that requires a Clean Water Act permit.

The tribe won at the federal court and circuit court levels. A decision is expected by this summer.

Get the Story:
Court Urged to Require EPA Role in Everglades Shift of Polluted Water (The Washington Post 1/15)
Supreme Court takes up air and water pollution cases (AP 1/14)
High court takes on Everglades water dispute (Knight Ridder Newspapers 1/14)

Relevant Links:
Miccosukee Tribe - http://www.miccosukee.com

Related Stories:
Miccosukee Tribe's case draws national attention (1/14)
Miccosukee Tribe sees lands slowly polluted (1/13)
Miccosukee Tribe gets day before Supreme Court (1/12)
Special master in Everglades case issues first report (12/02)
Judge names special master in Everglades case (11/07)
Special master to increase oversight of Everglades (10/31)
Judge to appoint special master for Everglades (10/30)
Miccosukee Tribe still won't sell Everglades land (10/15)
Tribe seeks special master for Everglades (10/07)
Federal judge in Everglades case disqualified (09/24)
Bush brief backs Fla. agency over Miccosukee Tribe (09/11)
Fla. water managers filing brief in tribe's case (9/10)
Miccosukee Tribe challenges state on Everglades (08/08)
Supreme Court to hear Everglades cleanup case (06/27)
Supreme Court docket shaping up (06/04)
DOJ brief backs tribe in Everglades cleanup suit (6/2)
Fla. governor signs Everglades cleanup bill (05/21)
Fla. governor may not sign Everglades bill (05/14)
Judge promises to stick by Everglades agreement (05/05)
Judge to hold hearing on Everglades cleanup (5/2)
Fla. governor expected to sign new Everglades bill (5/1)
Miccosukee Tribe opposes new Everglades bill (4/29)
Jeb Bush won't seize tribe's property for now (03/25)
Gov. Bush to vote on whether to seize tribe's land (03/12)
Everglades buyout revived in spending bill (02/17)
Miccosukee Tribe's case up for Supreme Court review (02/07)
Fla. moves to condemn tribe's land (12/13)
Supreme Court Docket: 2002-2003 (12/04)
Fla. tribe fights for court oversight (09/18)
Fla. tribe wins another Everglades suit (9/5)
Corps halts Everglades restoration work (8/15)
Enviros wanted Interior role boosted(7/24)
DOI stripped of Everglades provisions (7/17)
Court blocks forced Everglades move (7/10)
Fla. tribe wants clean Everglades (6/24)
Miccosukee Tribe launches ad campaign (6/21)
Fla. tribe happy with court ruling (2/5)
Fla. tribe wins Everglades suit (2/4)
Fla. tribe happy with court ruling (2/5)
Fla. tribe wins Everglades suit (2/4)
Norton trying to buy mineral rights (1/17)
Who is Gale Norton? (1/14)
Bush, brother sign Everglades agreement (1/10)
Miccosukee Tribe protests water policy (11/8)
Bush promotes green self (6/5)

Copyright © 2000-2003 Indianz.Com